Divadlo

6. prosince 2009 v 14:28 | Vecerda
O 17. listopadu jsme hráli divadlo (což už je u nás na škole takový zvyk). Natáčela tam Ústecká televize. A tenhle obraz mě zaujal.

 

Buď první, kdo ohodnotí tento článek.

Komentáře

1 vrbize vrbize | Web | 6. prosince 2009 v 17:17 | Reagovat

pěkný ,, jak je ten kameraman začerněný vyniknou ty děti..:)

2 Brooke Brooke | Web | 7. prosince 2009 v 18:05 | Reagovat

Nádhernýý !! ♥ =)

3 janasek janasek | Web | 15. prosince 2009 v 16:37 | Reagovat

ahoj promin že te otravuji ale jsem ve finále a potřebuji hlasy prosím mohla bysi pro mně hlasnout
http://michaelisking.blog.cz/0912/sonf-4-kolo tady předem dekuji
Přeji ti krásné vánoce s rodinou a Štastný nový Rok dekuji ahoj
ps. máš moc krásnej blog!

4 chym chym | 17. prosince 2009 v 7:42 | Reagovat

:-D dobra fotka...

5 Nikča Nikča | E-mail | 21. prosince 2009 v 22:17 | Reagovat

Týjo, koukám, že ses rozjel. Moc pěkná fotka. :)

6 Marie Marie | Web | 28. prosince 2009 v 21:04 | Reagovat

Ta fotka je skvělá.

7 al888 al888 | Web | 3. ledna 2010 v 15:03 | Reagovat

Kočka              B
Ryba               L  
Auto               O
Sýkora             G  
Noc
Elektrika
Jasmín

8 DanielSkymn DanielSkymn | E-mail | Web | 12. června 2017 v 17:37 | Reagovat
9 Williamfus Williamfus | E-mail | Web | 22. června 2017 v 9:23 | Reagovat

?How to write down a Comparative Analysis
Throughout your academic career, you'll be asked to write down papers in which you compare and contrast two things: two texts, two theories, two historical figures, two scientific processes, and so on. "Classic" compare-and-contrast papers, in which you weight A and B equally, may be about two similar things that have crucial differences (two pesticides with different effects relating to the environment) or two similar things that have crucial differences, yet turn out to have surprising commonalities (two politicians with vastly different world views who voice unexpectedly similar perspectives on sexual harassment).
With the "lens" (or "keyhole") comparison, in which you weight A less heavily than B, you make use of a as a lens through which to check out B. Just as seeking through a pair of glasses changes the way you see an object, choosing A as a framework for understanding B changes the way you see B. Lens comparisons are useful for illuminating, critiquing, or challenging the stability of the thing that, before the analysis, seemed perfectly understood. Often, lens comparisons take time into account: earlier texts, events, or historical figures may illuminate later ones, and vice versa.
Faced which has a daunting list of seemingly unrelated similarities and differences, you may really feel confused about how to construct a paper that isn't just a mechanical exercise in which you to start with state all the benefits that A and B have in regular, and then state all the ways in which A and B are different. Predictably, the thesis of these types of a paper is usually an assertion that A and B are very similar yet not so similar after all. To jot down a superior compare-and-contrast paper, you must take your raw data-the similarities and differences you've observed-and make them cohere into a meaningful argument. Below are the 5 aspects required.
Frame of Reference . This is the context within just which you spot the two things you plan to compare and contrast; it is the umbrella below which you have grouped them. The frame of reference may consist of an idea, theme, question, problem, or theory; a group of similar things from which you extract two for special attention; biographical or historical help and advice. The finest frames of reference are constructed from special resources rather than your have thoughts or observations. Thus, in a very paper comparing how two writers redefine social norms of masculinity, you would be significantly better off quoting a sociologist to the topic of masculinity than spinning out potentially banal-sounding theories of your personal. Most assignments tell you exactly what the frame of reference should be, and most courses supply resources for constructing it. Once you encounter an assignment that fails to grant a frame of reference, you must come up with an individual on your possess. A paper without these a context would have no angle for the material, no focus or frame to the writer to propose a meaningful argument.
Grounds for Comparison . Let's say you're composing a paper on world-wide food distribution, and you've chosen to compare apples and oranges. Why these particular fruits? Why not pears and bananas? The rationale behind your choice, the grounds for comparison . allows your reader know why your choice is deliberate and meaningful, not random. For instance, within a paper asking how the "discourse of domesticity" appears to have been implemented with the abortion discussion, the grounds for comparison are obvious; the issue has two conflicting sides, pro-choice and pro-life. In the paper comparing the effects of acid rain on two forest sites, your choice of sites is less obvious. A paper focusing on similarly aged forest stands in Maine plus the Catskills will be put in place differently from 1 comparing a new forest stand within the White Mountains with the old forest from the same region. You will need to indicate the reasoning behind your choice.
Thesis. The grounds for comparison anticipates the comparative nature of your thesis. As in any argumentative paper, your thesis statement will convey the gist of your argument, which necessarily follows from your frame of reference. But inside of a compare-and-contrast, the thesis is dependent on how the two things you've chosen to compare actually relate to a single another. Do they lengthen, corroborate, complicate, contradict, correct, or discussion a single another? Inside the most commonplace compare-and-contrast paper-one focusing on differences-you can indicate the precise relationship in between A and B by implementing the word "whereas" inside your thesis:
Whereas Camus perceives ideology as secondary to the desire to address a exact historical moment of colonialism, Fanon perceives a revolutionary ideology as being the impetus to reshape Algeria's history in a very direction toward independence.
Whether your paper focuses primarily on difference or similarity, you require to make the relationship in between A and B clear within your thesis. This relationship is within the heart of any compare-and-contrast paper.
Organizational Scheme. Your introduction will include your frame of reference, grounds for comparison, and thesis. There are two simple ways to organize the body of your paper.
In text-by-text . you discuss all of the, then all of B.
In point-by-point . you alternate points about A with comparable points about B.
Once you think that B extends A, you'll probably make use of a text-by-text scheme; should you see A and B engaged in discussion, a point-by-point scheme will draw attention to the conflict. Be aware, however, that the point-by- point scheme can come off as a ping-pong game. You can actually avoid this effect by grouping in excess of just one point together, thereby cutting down relating to the variety of times you alternate from the to B. But no matter which organizational scheme you choose, you'll need not give equal time to similarities and differences. In fact, your paper will be a lot more interesting as soon as you get to the heart of your argument as speedily as workable. Thus, a paper on two evolutionary theorists' different interpretations of unique archaeological findings may very well have as handful of as two or three sentences from the introduction on similarities and at most a paragraph or two to arrange the contrast concerning the theorists' positions. The rest within the paper, whether organized text- by-text or point-by-point, will treat the two theorists' differences.
You may organize a classic compare-and-contrast paper either text-by-text or point-by-point. But within a "lens" comparison, in which you spend significantly less time on the (the lens) than on B (the focal textual content), you almost always organize text-by-text. That's basically because A and B are not strictly comparable: A is merely a device for helping you discover whether or not B's nature is actually what expectations have led you to definitely believe it is.
Linking of the and B . All argumentative papers require you to definitely link every point inside of the argument back again to the thesis. Without this kind of links, your reader will be unable to see how new sections logically and systematically advance your argument. Within a compare-and contrast, you also desire to make links relating to A and B inside the body of your essay in the event you want your paper to hold together. To make these links, use transitional expressions of comparison and contrast ( similarly, moreover, likewise, in the contrary, conversely, around the other hand ) and contrastive vocabulary (during the example below, Southerner/Northerner ).
As a girl raised from the faded glory of your Old South, amid mystical tales of magnolias and moonlight, the mother remains part of the dying era. Surrounded by hard times, racial conflict, and minimal opportunities, Julian, relating to the other hand . feels repelled by the provincial nature of home, and represents a new Southerner, a single who sees his indigenous land through a condescending Northerner's eyes.
Copyright 1998, Kerry Walk, for that Creating Center at Harvard University

Nový komentář

Přihlásit se
  Ještě nemáte vlastní web? Můžete si jej zdarma založit na Blog.cz.
 

Aktuální články

Reklama